Introduction
Vaccination is usually discussed through the lens of human health. Yet some of the most consequential opportunities for immunization occur before a pathogen ever reaches a human being. Humans, animals, and the environment are part of interconnected biological systems in which infectious agents—and antimicrobial-resistant organisms—can move across species, ecosystems, and geographic boundaries.
Animal vaccination should therefore not be viewed simply as a component of veterinary medicine. It is an essential tool for One Health, global health security, food security, antimicrobial stewardship, and environmental sustainability.
This perspective has become increasingly important as animal diseases expand into previously unaffected geographic areas and species. Preventing infection in animals can protect not only animal health and welfare, but also human populations, food systems, economies, and the environment.
Animal vaccination is also human protection
The concept is straightforward: preventing infection in animals can interrupt transmission before pathogens reach humans.
Rabies provides perhaps the clearest example. Vaccinating dogs addresses infection at its principal reservoir and reduces the risk of human exposure, rather than relying exclusively on post-exposure interventions after transmission has already occurred. This approach demonstrates an important principle of One Health: sometimes the most effective way to prevent a human infectious disease is to control it in the animal population responsible for maintaining transmission.
But the principle extends far beyond rabies. Vaccination has an important role in controlling diseases affecting livestock, poultry, aquaculture, companion animals, and wildlife. Vaccination strategies have been used or investigated against infections such as brucellosis, avian influenza, anthrax, Rift Valley fever, Escherichia coli O157, Hendra virus, and other zoonotic diseases.
Wildlife vaccination further expands this concept. Oral vaccination campaigns against rabies, for example, have demonstrated that immunization can target reservoirs beyond traditional domestic animal populations.
By reducing infection and transmission in animals, vaccination can indirectly protect farmers, veterinarians, food-industry workers, communities, consumers, and ultimately entire populations.
This changes the way we should think about vaccines. The benefits of a veterinary vaccine do not necessarily end with the vaccinated animal. They can extend across species and ultimately contribute to human health.
Vaccines as a weapon against antimicrobial resistance
The relationship between animal vaccination and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) deserves considerably greater attention.
The mechanism is remarkably logical:
Vaccination prevents infections → fewer infections require treatment → antimicrobial consumption decreases → selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance can be reduced.
Vaccines and other preventive interventions can minimize the need for antibiotics by preventing and controlling infectious diseases in animal populations. This makes vaccination an important component of strategies designed to preserve antimicrobial effectiveness.
This matters because antimicrobial resistance does not recognize species boundaries. Resistant microorganisms and resistance determinants can circulate among humans, animals, food systems, water, soil, wastewater, and the wider environment. AMR is therefore fundamentally a One Health problem.
Importantly, vaccines should not be presented as substitutes for antimicrobials when treatment is medically necessary. Rather, they offer something potentially more powerful from a preventive perspective: the opportunity to prevent the infection that would have required antimicrobial treatment in the first place.
For this reason, reducing antimicrobial consumption should not depend exclusively on restricting antimicrobial prescribing. We should simultaneously invest in vaccines, surveillance, biosecurity, appropriate husbandry, diagnostics, and other interventions that decrease the incidence of infections requiring treatment.
Veterinary vaccines should therefore increasingly be considered part of the global strategy against AMR—not an intervention separate from it.
Protecting food systems and livelihoods
Healthy animals are fundamental to healthy societies.
Infectious diseases affecting livestock and aquaculture can decrease productivity, threaten food availability, disrupt international trade, produce major economic losses, and jeopardize the livelihoods of farmers and producers. Preventing disease through vaccination can reduce mortality and production losses while improving animal welfare and strengthening the resilience of food systems.
Norway: a remarkable salmon vaccination success story
Norwegian salmon farming provides one of the most compelling real-world examples of the relationship between vaccination, food production, and antimicrobial stewardship.
During the rapid development of Norwegian aquaculture in the 1980s, bacterial diseases resulted in extensive antibiotic use. The subsequent introduction and widespread implementation of effective vaccines, particularly against important bacterial diseases, fundamentally changed disease management. Vaccination was accompanied by improvements in biosecurity, husbandry, surveillance, and other preventive measures.
The transformation was remarkable. Midtlyng and colleagues documented the dramatic decline in antibacterial use accompanying the adoption of vaccination and other preventive measures in Norwegian aquaculture. Subsequent Norwegian surveillance confirmed that the most common bacterial diseases became largely controlled through vaccination, with only 212 kg of antibacterials sold for Norwegian aquaculture in 2016.
The experience becomes even more striking when viewed over several decades. The Norwegian salmon industry was able to expand enormously while antimicrobial dependence declined rather than increased. Modern reviews of aquaculture and AMR now specifically identify the vaccination of farmed salmon in Norway as an important case study demonstrating how disease prevention can reduce reliance on antibiotics.
The Norwegian experience demonstrates a powerful principle:
Increasing food production does not necessarily require increasing antimicrobial consumption.
When effective vaccination is combined with surveillance, biosecurity, appropriate husbandry, and responsible animal-health management, production can expand while dependence on antibiotics falls dramatically.
This is particularly relevant to the global AMR discussion. Rather than focusing exclusively on restricting antimicrobial use, we should simultaneously invest in interventions that reduce the need to use antimicrobials in the first place.
Animal vaccination therefore represents not only an infectious-disease intervention but also an important strategy for food security, sustainable agriculture and aquaculture, economic development, animal welfare, and antimicrobial stewardship.
Vaccinating animals can also protect the environment
The environmental dimension of vaccination is sometimes overlooked.
Antimicrobials administered to animals and antimicrobial-resistant organisms can enter the wider environment through animal waste, wastewater, agricultural runoff, and food-production systems. Reducing preventable infections can consequently reduce the need for antimicrobial treatment and potentially diminish one pathway through which antimicrobial selection pressure enters ecosystems.
The environmental argument extends beyond AMR. Animal disease outbreaks can cause substantial losses of livestock and food, require large-scale control measures, disrupt ecosystems, and place additional demands on land, water, feed, energy, and other natural resources. Disease prevention can therefore contribute to more efficient and resilient animal-production systems.
Climate change adds another dimension. Changing temperatures, rainfall patterns, vector distributions, wildlife migration, land use, and human–animal interactions can alter the geographic distribution and transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. Diseases previously restricted to particular ecosystems may emerge in new animal populations and potentially create new opportunities for zoonotic transmission.
Vaccination alone, however, is not sufficient. It must be integrated with responsible husbandry, biosecurity, disease surveillance, appropriate antimicrobial stewardship, environmental protection, and sustainable agricultural practices.
This is precisely why the One Health framework is so important: human health, animal health, and environmental health cannot be effectively protected when they are treated as independent domains.
Conclusions: From Veterinary Vaccines To Planetary Health
The value of animal vaccination extends far beyond protecting individual animals. By preventing infections, vaccines can reduce zoonotic transmission, decrease antimicrobial use and the selective pressure driving AMR, protect food production and livelihoods, and contribute to more sustainable use of environmental resources. The Norwegian salmon experience provides a powerful example of how vaccination, combined with surveillance, biosecurity, and good husbandry, can support expanding food production while dramatically reducing dependence on antibiotics.
These benefits are interconnected. An infection prevented in an animal may mean an antimicrobial treatment avoided, a zoonotic transmission interrupted, food production preserved, and economic losses prevented. Veterinary vaccination should therefore be increasingly incorporated into One Health strategies addressing pandemic preparedness, AMR, food security, and environmental sustainability.
Vaccination cannot accomplish this alone. Its greatest impact comes when integrated with surveillance, biosecurity, responsible antimicrobial use, good animal husbandry, and environmental protection.
Ultimately, animal vaccination is not simply a veterinary intervention—it is an investment in human health, animal health, food security, antimicrobial preservation, and planetary health.
Vaccinating animals does not only protect animals. It protects humans, preserves our antimicrobial arsenal, strengthens our food systems, and helps protect the planet we all share.
REFERENCES
- Monath TP, Kahn LH, Kaplan B. Introduction: One Health perspective. ILAR J. 2010;51(3):193–198. doi:10.1093/ilar.51.3.193.
- Monath TP. Vaccines against diseases transmitted from animals to humans: a One Health paradigm. Vaccine. 2013;31(46):5321–5338. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.029.
- World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). The State of the World’s Animal Health 2025. Paris: WOAH; 2025. https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2025/05/the-state-of-the-worlds-animal-health-2025.pdf
- World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Antimicrobial Resistance: A One Health Response to AMR. Paris: WOAH. https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/global-initiatives/antimicrobial-resistance/.
- World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Ninth Annual Report on Antimicrobial Agents Intended for Use in Animals. Paris: WOAH; 2025. https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2025/05/en-woah-amu-report-2025.pdf
- World Health Organization. Estimating the Impact of Vaccines in Reducing Antimicrobial Resistance and Antibiotic Use: Technical Report. Geneva: WHO; 2024. ISBN 978-92-4-009878-7. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240098787.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, World Organisation for Animal Health. One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022–2026): Working Together for the Health of Humans, Animals, Plants and the Environment. 2022. doi:10.20506/9789295121430.
- Hoelzer K, Bielke L, Blake DP, et al. Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics for food producing animals. Part 1: challenges and needs. Vet Res. 2018;49:64. doi:10.1186/s13567-018-0560-8.
- Hoelzer K, Bielke L, Blake DP, et al. Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics for food producing animals. Part 2: new approaches and potential solutions. Vet Res. 2018;49:70. doi:10.1186/s13567-018-0561-7.
- Roth JA. Veterinary vaccines and their importance to animal health and public health. Procedia Vaccinol. 2011;5:127–136. doi:10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.009.
- Swayne DE. Impact of vaccines and vaccination on global control of avian influenza. Avian Dis. 2012;56(4 Suppl):818–828. doi:10.1637/10183-041012-Review.1.
- OECD. Embracing a One Health Framework to Fight Antimicrobial Resistance. OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. doi:10.1787/ce44c755-en.
- Midtlyng PJ, Grave K, Horsberg TE. What has been done to minimize the use of antibacterial and antiparasitic drugs in Norwegian aquaculture? Aquac Res. 2011;42(Suppl 1):28–34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02726.x.
- Lillehaug A, Børnes C, Grave K. A pharmaco-epidemiological study of antibacterial treatments and bacterial diseases in Norwegian aquaculture from 2011 to 2016. Dis Aquat Organ. 2018;128(2):117–125. doi:10.3354/dao03219.
- Barnes AC, Rudenko O, Landos M, et al. Autogenous vaccination in aquaculture: a locally enabled solution towards reduction of the global antimicrobial resistance problem. Rev Aquac. 2022;14:907–918. doi:10.1111/raq.12633.
- Bondad-Reantaso MG, MacKinnon B, Karunasagar I, et al. Review of alternatives to antibiotic use in aquaculture. Rev Aquac. 2023;15:1421–1451. doi:10.1111/raq.12786.
